|
Response to the Academic Bill of Rights
|
Ten
student, faculty, and
civil-liberties groups -
including the AAUP - have banded together to
fight the
"academic bill of rights."
Read
more about this coalition.
Free
Exchange on Campus
|
Proponents
of an Academic
Bill of Rights believe that American colleges
and universities should guarantee "intellectual (read
'ideological') diversity" by legislating "fair
and balanced" practices of grading, curriculum
development, selection of invited speakers, allocation
of university funds, hiring, firing, promotion and
tenure review. The movement has built momentum in
several states, and appeared recently in California
as proposed Senate Bills 1335 and 5. Both of these
bills died in Committee, but the heated and vigorous
debate has gained national attention. A comparison
of these two bills is available.
Although
the ABoR, originally drafted by columnist David Horowitz,
relies
upon language drawn from the AAUP's landmark 1940
Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure,
in reality, it pushes an agenda that is antithetical to the
best traditions of American higher education. Horowitz' appropriation
of that document has been roundly denounced by the AAUP as
"a
grave threat to fundamental principles of academic freedom."
Dr. Graham Larkin, CA-AAUP VP for Private Colleges and Universities,
agrees. In a special report published on this site in September
2004, he examined the simplistic worldview, flawed statistics,
and political irresponsibility behind the Bill. The Bill's
creator, David Horowitz, responded to Larkin's essay following
his January 15th radio debate with Larkin and AAUP Associate
Secretary, Marcus Harvey. The exchange is available here.
|
To
join the fight against the
Academic Bill of Rights, get
involved
with the AAUP, tireless defenders of
academic freedom since 1915.
|
|
©2006 CA-AAUP
This page was last updated on June 26, 2006.
|
| AAUP
Statements and Articles |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|